| 80 | 0 | 73 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
针对硬质光纤传像元件芯皮界面元素迁移研究中存在的表征与定量分析难题,提出一种基于多模型融合的Tree-SVM/LDA计算模型。该模型通过整合决策树(Tree)、线性支持向量机(SVM)和线性判别分析算法,建立了基于扫描透射电子显微镜高角环形暗场像(HAADF-STEM)的元素迁移定量分析方法,重点构建了特定元素平均迁移距离D的计算体系。采用电阻加热配套棒管的方法制备具有温度梯度的单丝样品体系,通过获取多尺度分辨率(0.5~3.0 nm)的HAADF图像数据进行模型训练与评估。定量分析表明:在优化拉丝温度区间内,K元素平均迁移距离D_K∈[10,40]nm,Ba和Ti元素平均迁移距离分别为D_Ba∈[0,11]nm、D_Ti∈[0,13]nm。高分辨率(0.5 nm)条件下模型可靠性显著提升,其中,Tree-SVM模型分类准确率优于Tree-LDA模型,但Tree-LDA模型展现出更优的泛化性能。该单次热过程元素扩散计算框架,为后续多次热过程元素迁移的非线性计算模型研究提供了一种重要的方法。
Abstract:Introduction Hard optical fiber imaging components as two-dimensional array imaging materials comprised of tens of millions to billions of micro-and nano-scale optical glass fibers have extensive applications in numerous optical systems, including low-light-level image intensifiers and space target detection systems. Resolution and contrast are crucial indicators affecting the performance of these components. Elemental diffusion at the core-clad interface results in a gradient distribution of material refractive index rather than the ideal abrupt distribution, thereby degrading the resolution and contrast of the components. It is necessary for the demands for refined manufacturing processes of these components to gain a comprehensive understanding of the diffusion behavior and distribution status of elements at the core-clad interface. At present, energy dispersive spectrometry(EDS) is often employed as a characterization tool for elemental distribution status, yet it suffers from a low image resolution(20 nm) and lacks corresponding quantitative calculation methods. In this study, high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy(HAADF-STEM) was utilized to acquire high-precision images of elemental spatial distribution. Furthermore, a multi-model fusion machine learning approach was proposed to address the challenges of characterization and quantitative analysis in the study of elemental migration at the core-clad interface of hard optical fiber imaging components. Methods In this study, monofilaments undergoing various thermal processes were fabricated by a drawing technique. High-Angle Annular Dark-Field(HAADF) images were captured and utilized to train Tree-SVM/LDA models. These models enabled pixel-level core-clad classification and x-y two-dimensional spatial classification, thereby yielding quantitative results on elemental interface diffusion. In addition, the reliability of the models was also analyzed. The Tree-SVM/LDA model is grounded on the following assumptions, i.e., element Si as a key component in the formation of both core and cladding glass network structures remains stable during the diffusion process. The deviation distances of other elements are benchmarked against that of Si, the average deviation(D) is defined as an arithmetic mean of the migration distances of all elements within the tested range, serving to characterize the overall diffusion behavior of elements rather than individual extreme values, elements undergo unidirectional migration, consistent with the direction of the concentration gradient, manifesting as the perpendicular direction to the interface in monofilament samples, the transition zone at the core-cladding interface is formed through the superposition of diffusion behaviors of different elements, and the algorithmic procedure of model encompasses the following steps(i.e., constructing training and prediction datasets; training the decision tree model; developing a labeled prediction dataset; and obtaining classification hyperplane parameters). Results and discussion The results obtained by SVM and LDA models both indicate the thermodynamic principles at higher resolutions, with the deviation D_K∈[10, 40]nm, D_Ba∈[0, 11]nm, and D_Ti∈[0,13]nm. At lower resolutions, where the width of a single pixel in the raw data is 3 nm, the computational error of the models is amplified threefold, leading to the results that deviate from actual principles. At 810 ℃, the SVM model exhibits a poor data separability due to the low content of Ti in the cladding region, resulting in abnormal calculation results. This phenomenon underscores the superiority of the LDA model over SVM in terms of training set diversity, demonstrating a greater generalization capability. The calculation results of the SVM model and LDA model show a good consistency, while also presenting regular differences, i.e., the boundaries obtained by the LDA model tend to skew towards the cladding region relative to those of the SVM model. This regularity may be associated with differences in model characteristics and the element distribution patterns in the HAADF images of the core and cladding regions, having a further in-depth research. In general, the SVM model achieves higher accuracy than the LDA model. However, the LDA model possesses a better generalization capability. Conclusions The migration capabilities of the elements K, Ti, and Ba intensified as the wire drawing temperature increased. Specifically, the average migration distance of element K could range from 10 nm to 40 nm, while that of elements Ti and Ba could span from 0 to 13 nm. Affecting the reliability of models were since the spatial resolution of the raw data could be in atomic or sub-atomic scale, models could be sensitive to data anomalies, thus requiring repeated training, elements with great diffusion capabilities could decrease the accuracy of the model, while simultaneously enhancing its generalization capability. The SVM model demonstrated superior accuracy, compared to the LDA model, having a weaker generalization capability. The SVM model could be recommended at a high quality of the raw data, whereas the results of the LDA model could be more realistic at a low quality of the raw data.
[1]贾金升.高分辨低缺陷光纤倒像器制备关键技术及应用[Z].中国建筑材料科学研究总院有限公司, 2022–12–28.
[2]程宏昌,党小刚,冯丹青,等.国外微光夜视装备发展分析[J].红外技术, 2024, 46(12):1399–1410.CHENG Hongchang, DANG Xiaogang, FENG Danqing, et al. Infrared Technol, 2024, 46(12):1399–1410.
[3]李闻先.基于光纤传像元件的空间目标探测系统成像技术研究[D].长春:中国科学院大学(中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所), 2022.LI Wenxian. Research on imaging technology of space target detection system based on optical fiber image transmission element[D].Changchun:Changchun Institute of Optics, Fine Mechanics and Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022.
[4] FOURMENTIN C, GUICHARD J, DRUART G, et al. Infrared gradient refractive INdex(GRIN)materials through fast solid-solid Na+/Ag+ionic exchange in chalco-halide glasses[J]. Adv Funct Mater,2024, 34(29):2312275.
[5]陈宫傣.纤维集成光器件的热扩散方法研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学, 2020.CHEN Gongdai. Study on thermal diffusion method of fiber integrated optical devices[D]. Harbin:Harbin Engineering University, 2020.
[6]吕锋,黄亮,罗军明,等. Ce 、 La添加对DyCo晶界扩散烧结Nd–Fe–B磁体性能的影响[J].材料热处理学报, 2023, 44(9):79–86.LüFeng, HUANG Liang, LUO Junming, et al. Trans Mater Heat Treat,2023, 44(9):79–86.
[7]石攀,黄永刚,王久旺,等.微通道板热加工过程中芯皮玻璃界面的成分扩散[J].硅酸盐学报, 2018, 46(5):700–706.SHI Pan, HUANG Yonggang, WANG Jiuwang, et al. J Chin Ceram Soc, 2018, 46(5):700–706.
[8]郝龙龙,覃丽禄.高质量扫描透射电子显微镜高角环形暗场像的实验关键点[J].实验科学与技术, 2020, 18(3):7–10.HAO Longlong, QIN Lilu. Exp Sci Technol, 2020, 18(3):7–10.
[9] B?DKER M L, BAUCHY M, DU T, et al. Predicting glass structure by physics-informed machine learning[J]. NPJ Comput Mater, 2022, 8:192.
[10] CASSAR D R, MASTELINI S M, BOTARI T, et al. Predicting and interpreting oxide glass properties by machine learning using large datasets[J]. Ceram Int, 2021, 47(17):23958–23972.
[11] JANZEN G, SMIT C, VISBEEK S, et al. Classifying the age of a glass based on structural properties:A machine learning approach[J]. Phys Rev Mater, 2024, 8(2):025602.
[12] BAJPAI A, BHATT J, GURAO N P, et al. Accelerated design of multicomponent metallic glasses using machine learning[J]. J Mater Res, 2022, 37(15):2428–2445.
[13] AHMMAD S K, ALSAIF N A M, SHAMS M S, et al. Machine learning density prediction and optical properties of calcium boro–zinc glasses[J]. Opt Mater, 2022, 134:113145.
[14] DENG B H. Machine learning on density and elastic property of oxide glasses driven by large dataset[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2020, 529:119768.
[15] NAKAMURA K, OTANI N, KOIKE T. Multi-objective Bayesian optimization of optical glass compositions[J]. Ceram Int, 2021, 47(11):15819–15824.
[16] ANOOP KRISHNAN N M, MANGALATHU S, SMEDSKJAER M M, et al. Predicting the dissolution kinetics of silicate glasses using machine learning[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2018, 487:37–45.
[17] QI R, LIU S H, YANG C Q, et al. Exploring uncertainty in glass phase transitions through machine learning[J]. Phys Scr, 2024, 99(10):1059c1.
[18] LIU H, FU Z P, YANG K, et al. Machine learning for glass science and engineering:A review[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2021, 557:119419.
[19] SINGH J, SINGH S. A review on Machine learning aspect in physics and mechanics of glasses[J]. Mater Sci Eng B, 2022, 284:115858.
[20] ZAUNER G, SCHAGERL M. Machine vision based quality inspection of flat glass products[C]//Image Processing:Machine Vision Applications VII. San Francisco, California, USA. SPIE, 2014.
[21] YOUSEFIAN-JAZI A, RYU J H, YOON S, et al. Decision support in machine vision system for monitoring of TFT-LCD glass substrates manufacturing[J]. J Process Contr, 2014, 24(6):1015–1023.
[22]乔敏达,白林阁,王书恒,等.计算成像技术中的点扩散函数工程[J].数据采集与处理, 2024, 39(2):271–296.QIAO Minda, BAI Linge, WANG Shuheng, et al. J Data Acquis Process, 2024, 39(2):271–296.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250119
中图分类号:TN253
引用信息:
[1]张淑瑾,张敬,于浩洋,等.光纤界面元素扩散的线性分类模型计算[J].硅酸盐学报,2025,53(12):3779-3789.DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250119.
基金信息:
国家自然基金资助项目(52072357)