| 401 | 1 | 170 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
轻质超高性能混凝土(LUHPC)表面粗糙化对异质铺装材料层间抗剪性能影响非常关键。如何高效地实现粗糙化表面制备,并考虑钢纤维影响,进而定量表征宏–微观纹理特性及粗糙度,关联异质铺装材料层间抗剪性能仍有待深入研究。通过抛丸打毛工艺实现煤矸石集料轻质UHPC的表面粗糙化,使用3D手持激光扫描仪获取试件表面的三维纹理数据;通过MATLAB软件采用高斯滤波的方法对点云数据进行滤波处理,并重构试件表面的三维形貌图,利用带通滤波器提取轻质UHPC的宏–微观纹理剖面数据,考虑到钢纤维对试件表面粗糙度的影响,基于铺砂法测量原理提出改进评价指标–扩展构造深度ETD;将宏观纹理参数轮廓断面算数平均偏差Ra、轮廓断面均方根偏差Rq、增强平均构造深度EMTD、增强平均断面深度EMPD和微观纹理参数CMT、均方根微观参数RMS与ETD的相关性进行分析,结合轻质UHPC–应力吸收层–高黏高弹改性沥青(SMA)复合试件的抗剪强度,将25℃和–10℃的抗剪强度与宏–微观指标参数结合,建立了单指标、多变量指标线性回归方程模型。结果表明:扩展构造深度ETD能够有效表征轻质UHPC表面粗糙度;对比相同温度、不同粗糙度下的抗剪性能,轻质UHPC表面粗糙度越大,ETD越大,其抗剪性能也越好,剪切强度25℃达到0.95 MPa,–10℃达到5.24 MPa。轻质UHPC推荐的扩展构造深度ETD为0.85~1.15 mm。
Abstract:Introduction Lightweight Ultra High Performance Concrete(LUHPC) exhibits attributes such as reduced weight, high strength, and minimal shrinkage. As a substrate for paving layers, the surface roughness of LUHPC is a critical determinant of interlayer shear resistance, tensile pullout resistance, and the prevention of early slippage and delamination. Notably, the lower surface hardness of gangue porous aggregates contributes significantly to the textural enhancement of LUHPC surfaces. The incorporation of steel fibers not only strengthens the internal bonding within the concrete but also influences the surface texture of LUHPC after roughening treatments. Despite existing research on the textural properties of pavement surfaces, there remains a gap in understanding the preparation of roughened interfaces for efficient application and the quantitative characterization of macro-micro texture characteristics and roughness influenced by steel fibers, which correlates with interlayer shear performance. While existing research has investigated the texture characteristics of pavement surfaces, there remains a critical need for further exploration into the development of roughened interfaces that facilitate effective implementation, a more detailed quantitative characterization of macro-micro texture and roughness, particularly under the influence of steel fibers, is necessary. Such investigations are crucial for establishing a robust correlation with the interlayer shear performance of heterogeneous paving materials. Additionally, Lightweight UHPC-high viscosity high elasticity binder-SMA specimens were fabricated to assess shear strength across different shot blasting intensities and temperatures. Linear regression analyses were conducted to model the relationships between macro-micro texture parameters and shear strength. Methods The surface roughness of gangue aggregate LUHPC was achieved through a shot blasting process, with three-dimensional texture data acquired via a handheld laser scanner. The point cloud data was processed using Gaussian filtering in MATLAB software to reconstruct the specimen's surface topography. Subsequently, both macroscopic and microscopic texture profiles of LUHPC were extracted utilizing a band-pass filter. The influence of steel fibers on the surface roughness of the specimen was assessed. An enhanced evaluation index, the Extended Tectonic Depth(ETD), was proposed, drawing upon the sand laying method's measurement principles. The correlations between macro-texture parameters(Ra, Rq, EMTD, EMPD) and micro-texture parameters(CMT, RMS) with ETD were analyzed. Furthermore, the relationship between shear strengths of the LUHPC-stress absorbing layer-SMA composite specimen and both macro-and micro-texture parameters was examined. Results and discussion As the degree of shot blasting increased, the surface of LUHPC became rougher, the ETD grew larger, and the shear performance of LUHPC-high viscosity high elasticity binder-SMA improved at different temperatures. Under the influence of steel fiber, increasing the degree of shot blasting effectively enhanced the overall shear strength. With more shot blasting, the coverage of steel shot on the specimen's surface gradually increased, the depth of sanding continued to grow, the height of the steel fiber protrusions increased, and the peak of the specimen profile became larger, while the surface depth of the non-steel fiber portion tended to be homogeneous. The correlation of the ETD with Ra, Rq, EMPD, and RMS was better, and the correlation with EMTD and CMT was average. The damage in LUHPC-SMA composite specimens primarily occurred in different surface layers of the bond layer, with no damage to the mixture. he correlation of the shear strength at 25 ℃ with Rq and RMS was good, with an R2 greater than 0.85. The multivariate analysis of shear strength and macro-micro texture parameters showed that for bivariate macro texture parameters ETD, EMPD, EMTD, Ra, Rq, the R2 was greater than 0.85 at 25 ℃, and ranged from 0.6 to 0.85 at –10 ℃. When the bivariate consisted of micro texture parameters RMS and CMT, the correlation for both 25 ℃ and –10 ℃ was better, with an R2 greater than 0.85. The correlation between shear strength and macro-micro texture parameters improved as the number of variables increased. Conclusions In view of the influence of steel fibres on the surface texture of the specimens after shot blasting, EMTD and EMPD were used to replace MTD and MPD to characterize the macroscopic texture properties of the materials more effectively; Based on the measurement principle of the sand laying method, the extended tectonic depth(ETD) was proposed as a new evaluation index. Multivariate linear regression analyses of ETD with macro texture parameters(Ra, Rq, EMTD, EMPD) and micro texture parameters(CMT, RMS) were carried out, and the results showed that the correlation between ETD and macro-micro texture parameters was strong. According to the comprehensive consideration of each index parameter under different degrees of shot blasting, it was stipulated that the ETD of the extended construction depth of the lightweight UHPC surface in the interval of 0.60–0.70 mm was considered as a light shot blasting effect, the interval of 0.70–0.85 mm was considered as a moderate shot blasting effect, and the interval of 0.85–1.15 mm was considered as a heavy shot blasting effect. The correlation analysis of the shear strength of the composite specimens at –10℃ and 25 ℃ with the macroscopic texture parameters(ETD, EMPD, EMTD, Ra, Rq) and the microscopic texture parameters(CMT and RMS) showed that: The larger the depth of the extended structure, the better the shear performance at the same temperature; The correlation with the shear strength was gradually strengthened with the increase of the number of variables; and the correlation of the all-variable indexes and shear strength was the best at 0.999. The correlation between all variables and shear strength reached 0.999. Comparing the experimental results under different levels of shot blasting, it was concluded that the extended structural depth of lightweight UHPC surfaces had a positive correlation with the shear strength, and therefore the extended structural depth of ETD was recommended to be 0.85–1.15 mm in this paper.
[1]丁庆军,胡俊,刘勇强,等.轻质超高性能混凝土的设计与研究[J].混凝土, 2019(9):1–5.DING Qingjun, HU Jun, LIU Yongqiang, et al. Concrete, 2019(9):1–5.
[2]付军,徐梦豪,王哲世,等.低收缩LUHPC钢桥面铺装组合基本性能试验研究[J].公路交通科技, 2023, 40(8):89–95.FU Jun, XU Meng-hao, WANG Zhe-shi, et al, J Highw Transp Res Dev,2023, 40(8):89–95.
[3]汪超,朱文娟,陈浩.基于室内试验的桥面防水黏结层应用探讨[J].上海公路, 2016(2):69–72+75+12.WANG Chao, ZHU Wenjuan, CHEN Hao. SH Highw, 2016(2):69–72+75+12.
[4]万晨光,申爱琴,薛翠真,等.层间接触状态对桥面铺装结构力学响应的影响[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 43(9):113–119.WAN Chenguang, SHEN Aiqin, XUE Cuizhen, et al. J Hunan Univ Nat Sci, 2016, 43(9):113–119.
[5]严秋荣,孙瑞,孔令云,等.基于现场数据混凝土桥面粗糙度与层间粘结强度相关性分析[J].中外公路, 2016, 36(6):63–65.Yan Qiurong, Sun Rui, Kong Lingyun, et al. J Chin Forei Highw, 2016,36(6):63–65.
[6]易量.基于层间粘结强度的桥面抛丸评价指标研究[J].国防交通工程与技术, 2019, 17(4):10–13.YI Liang. Traffic Eng Technol Natl Def, 2019, 17(4):10–13.
[7]杨清林,武炳焕,刘永安.钢丸粒度对铸件抛丸清理效率和表面粗糙度的影响[J].中国铸造装备与技术, 2002(6):10–13.YANG Qinglin, WU Binghuan, LIU Yongan. China Foundry Mach Technol, 2002(6):10–13.
[8] ZENG Y, QIU Z, YANG C C, et al. Fatigue experimental study on full-scale large sectional model of orthotropic steel deck of urban rail bridge[J]. Adv Mech Eng, 2023, 15(3):168781322311552.
[9] JIN C, XING S N, GE D D, et al. A digital measurement method for mean texture depth of asphalt pavement by virtual sand patch test[J].Constr Build Mater, 2024, 438:137308.
[10] WENG Z H, XIANG H, LIN Y C, et al. Pavement texture depth estimation using image-based multiscale features[J]. Autom Constr,2022, 141:104404.
[11] DAN H C, BAI G W, ZHU Z H, et al. An improved computation method for asphalt pavement texture depth based on multiocular vision3D reconstruction technology[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2022, 321:126427.
[12] CHEN J Y, HUANG X M, ZHENG B S, et al. Real-time identification system of asphalt pavement texture based on the close-range photogrammetry[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 226:910–919.
[13] GAO L, LIU M X, WANG Z Q, et al. Correction of texture depth of porous asphalt pavement based on CT scanning technique[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2019, 200:514–520.
[14]庞学慧,张晓艳,秦慧斌,等.轮廓法表面粗糙度幅度参数分析及其应用研究[J].工具技术, 2024, 58(1):137–142.PANG Xuehui, ZHANG Xiaoyan, QIN Huibin, et al. Tool Eng, 2024,58(1):137–142.
[15]战友,邓强胜,罗志伟,等.基于GBDT的沥青路面抗滑性能感知模型研究[J].土木工程学报, 2023, 56(2):121–132.ZHAN You, DENG Qiangsheng, LUO Zhiwei, et al. China Civ Eng J,2023, 56(2):121–132.
[16]战友,李强,马啸天,等.基于宏微观纹理特征融合的路面摩擦性能预测[J].浙江大学学报(工学版), 2021, 55(4):684–694.Zhan You, LI Qiang, MA Xiao-tian, et al. Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science), 2021, 55(4):684–694.
[17] ADAMS J M, RICHARD KIM Y. Mean profile depth analysis of field and laboratory traffic-loaded chip seal surface treatments[J]. Int J Pavement Eng, 2014, 15(7):645–656.
[18] DING S H, WANG K C P, YANG E H, et al. Influence of effective texture depth on pavement friction based on 3D texture area[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2021, 287:123002.
[19]樊双蛟,王葱葱,陈稳旭,等.电化学机械复合光整加工不锈钢管件表面局部深沟的粗糙度综合评价[C].中国机械工程学会特种加工分会, 2019:1.
[20] KOUCHAKI S, ROSHANI H, PROZZI J A, et al. Evaluation of aggregates surface micro-texture using spectral analysis[J]. Constr Build Mater, 2017, 156:944–955.
[21]艾长发,刘一鸣,任东亚.基于压-直剪试验方法的沥青路面层间污染特性[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 43(5):21–29.AI Changfa, LIU Yiming, REN Dongya. J Chang’an Univ Nat Sci Ed,2023, 43(5):21–29.
[22]艾长发,李林育,黄恒伟,等.沥青路面层间界面摩阻效应及其对层间抗剪强度影响机理[J].中国公路学报, 2023, 36(12):47–63.AI Changfa, LI Linyu, HUANG Hengwei, et al. China J Highw Transp,2023, 36(12):47–63.
[23]严秋荣,许磊,代笠,等.温度和粗糙度对混凝土桥面铺装层间剪切强度的影响研究[J].西安建筑科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,52(3):328–334.YAN Qiurong, XU Lei, DAI Li, et al. J Xi’an Univ Archit Technol Nat Sci Ed, 2020, 52(3):328–334.
[24]田柳.手持激光扫描仪测量精度评定方法研究[D].武汉:武汉大学, 2021.Tian Liu, Research on evaluation method of measurement accuracy of hand-held laser scanner[D].Wuhan:Wuhan University, 2021.
[25]高博.钢桥面典型铺装方案及其病害和维修方法[J].公路, 2012(7):29–34.GAO Bo. Highway, 2012(7):29–34.
[26]中机生产力促进中心、中国航空综合技术研究所、郑州大学、华中科技大学、西安. GB/Z 24637.1—2009产品几何技术规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社, 2010.
[27]李冬梅.沥青路面抗滑集料微观纹理系数计算及试验:基于扫描电镜法[J].福建工程学院学报, 2009, 7(3):241–243.LI Dongmei. J Fujian Univ Technol, 2009, 7(3):241–243.
[28]董仕豪,韩森,宿金菲,等.沥青路面表面纹理三维评价方法及其计算边界条件分析[J/OL].中国公路学报,2024–10–23.Dong Shiha, Han Sen, Su Jinfei, et al, China J Highw Transp,2024–10–23.
[29]张占军,王虎,胡长顺,等.水泥混凝土桥面沥青铺装及防水层荷载弯曲应力分析[J].中国公路学报, 2004, 17(4):37–40.ZHANG Zhanjun, WANG Hu, HU Changshun, et al. China J Highw Transp, 2004, 17(4):37–40.
[30]招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司等. JTG/T 3364-02—2019公路钢桥面铺装设计与施工技术规范[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2019.
基本信息:
DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20240572
中图分类号:TU528
引用信息:
[1]付军,遆彦池,秦宁辰,等.轻质超高性能混凝土表面粗糙化特性及组合式构件层间抗剪性能[J].硅酸盐学报,2025,53(08):2273-2286.DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20240572.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金(U21A20149)
2025-01-10
2025-01-10
2025-01-10