| 865 | 5 | 83 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
随着社会老龄化的加剧，慢性创伤患者的发病率和死亡率激增。高复发率慢性创面难以得到简单有效和低成本的治疗，加重了医疗系统的负担，致使临床对高疗效、新疗法和创新产品的需求持续增长。近年来研究表明，生物活性玻璃可以通过调节免疫相关巨噬细胞、内皮细胞、真皮成纤维细胞和表皮细胞等，促进伤口愈合，成为一种具有临床应用前景的伤口敷料。特别是硼酸盐和硼硅酸盐组成的生物活性玻璃显示出可控的降解速率，可针对伤口愈合不同病理阶段，持续性释放功能离子并调控伤口微环境，以此诱导血管新生和加速病理伤口组织稳态恢复。本文简要概述了硼酸/硼硅酸盐生物活性玻璃结构与性能关系，重点介绍了其临床应用研究进展，并对未来生物活性玻璃创面敷料的发展进行了展望。
Abstract：The morbidity and mortality of patients with chronic wounds increase with the aggravation of social aging. The sharp rise in the burden of the medical system leads to an increased demand for high clinical efficacy, developed therapies, and innovative products. Bioactive glass(BGs) is well considered as a promising clinical material in biomedical fields, especially in wound healing. BGs stimulate the production of growth factors due to its unique controlled dynamic ion release properties, enhancing cell proliferation and regulating the gene expression of related cells. Particularly, the bioglass composed of borate and borosilicate exhibits a controllable degradation rate, which can continuously release functional ions and regulate the wound microenvironment for various pathological stages of wound healing to induce angiogenesis and accelerate the steady recovery of pathological wound tissue. In over 50 years of clinical and fundamental research, the efficacy of bone grafts in repairing bone tissue has been conclusively demonstrated, and biomaterial scientists have analyzed in depth the molecular biological mechanisms underlying the interaction between BGs and bone. Emerging applications of BGs for soft tissue repair still require a further research. This review represented a relationship between the structure and properties of boric acid/borosilicate bioactive glass, focusing on the clinical application research progress and future prospects for the development of bioglass wound dressings. Complicated factors make chronic wounds difficult to manage. The excessive inflammation is a key factor in wound pathogenesis. To treat chronic wounds, it is essential to comprehend how to prevent the development of microorganisms at the wound site, reduce ROS production and tissue inflammation, induce cells to release more growth factors, alter the cell vitality, chemotaxis and mobility, and initiate new blood vessel growth. The development of BGs reveals its positive role in the treatment, restoration, and regeneration of hard and soft tissues in the human body. Compared to conventional inactive biomaterials, its clinical application significance and potential are substantial. Borosilicate bioactive glass(BBGs) with a unique glass network structure has a faster degradation rate, compared to silicate bioactive glass, making it suitable for soft tissue repair. BBGs with specific functional properties can be produced via adjusting the proportion of biologically active elements(i.e., Na, K, Ag, Au, B, Ca, Cu, Co, Ga, Mg, Sr and Zn) doped into the glass network structure according to the therapeutic needs of target tissues or organs. BBGs with different ion compositions can continuously release functional ions and regulate the wound microenvironment for different pathological stages of wound healing, thereby inducing angiogenesis and accelerating the steady-state recovery of pathological wound tissue. In addition to the superior clinical therapeutic effect by using fiber as clinical application dressing, BBGs can also combine with polymer to form functional hydrogel dressing, and can prepare multi-functional composite materials by electrospinning technology or 3D tissue engineering printing technology to meet the personalized needs of different stages of wound repair. The majority of chronic wound patients are affected with the intensification of global aging. Boric acid/borosilicate bioactive glass wound repair materials are low-cost, easy to store, and have significant social and economic benefits. Summary and prospects Although clinical and basic application studies have confirmed the potential of BBGs in wound healing applications, the structural composition of BBGs, especially the types and concentrations of therapeutic ions released, as well as the regularity and molecular biological mechanisms of pathological wound healing, still need a further exploration. The risk of soft tissue and organ toxicity, and even systemic toxicity caused by BBGs, is needed to be evaluated. Also, it is necessary to effectively evaluate and ensure the biosafety of BBGs dissolved ions, and to construct a more advanced in-vitro simulated wound dynamic microenvironment. In addition, combining BBGs as additives with other treatment strategies(such as stem cell therapy or growth factors or drugs) or technologies(such as negative pressure drainage) could be a possible synergistic strategy for promoting wound healing and repair. In summary, the existing researches indicate that the full potential of BGs in medicine is not fully developed, and the related market is expected to further grow in the future.
[1] WANG P H, HUANG B S, HORNG H C, et al. Wound healing[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2018, 81(2):94–101.
[2] Chronic Wounds:A Growing Problem. https://www.missionrmc.org/services/the-wound-healing-center/chronic-wounds-a-growing-problem/.
[3] The National Health and Family Planning Commission. Report on Nutrition and Chronic Disease Status of Chinese Residents 2015[R].2015.
[4] Chinese Diabetes Society. Clinical guidelines for prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the elderly in China[J]. Nat Library Med, 2022, 61(1):12–50.
[5]付小兵.如何在中国建立规范化的体表慢性难愈合创面防控培训与教育体系:我们的初步实践与体会[J].感染、炎症、修复, 2019,20(1):23–26.FU Xiaobing. Infection Inflammation Repair, 2019, 20(1):23–26.
[6] MEHRABI T, MESGAR A S, MOHAMMADI Z. Bioactive glasses:a promising therapeutic ion release strategy for enhancing wound healing[J]. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2020, 6(10):5399–5430.
[7] BAINO F, HAMZEHLOU S, KARGOZAR S. Bioactive glasses:where are we and where are we going?[J]. J Funct Biomater, 2018, 9(1):25.
[8] MONTAZERIAN M, ZANOTTO E D. A guided walk through Larry Hench’s monumental discoveries[J]. J Mater Sci, 2017, 52(15):8695–8732.
[9] BALASUBRAMANIAN P, BüTTNER T, MIGUEZ PACHECO V, et al. Boron-containing bioactive glasses in bone and soft tissue engineering[J]. J Eur Ceram Soc, 2018, 38(3):855–869.
[10] PANG L B, TIAN P F, CUI X, et al. In situ photo-cross-linking hydrogel accelerates diabetic wound healing through restored hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha pathway and regulated inflammation[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13(25):29363–29379.
[11] STONE-WEISS N, BRADTMüLLER H, ECKERT H, et al.Composition-structure-solubility relationships in borosilicate glasses:toward a rational design of bioactive glasses with controlled dissolution behavior[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021, 13(27):31495–31513.
[12] LIU W L, DAN X L, LU W W, et al. Spatial distribution of biomaterial microenvironment pH and its modulatory effect on osteoclasts at the early stage of bone defect regeneration[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,2019, 11(9):9557–9572.
[13] PANG L B, ZHAO R L, CHEN J, et al. Osteogenic and anti-tumor Cu and Mn-doped borosilicate nanoparticles for syncretic bone repair and chemodynamic therapy in bone tumor treatment[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021,12:1–15.
[14] KARGOZAR S, SINGH R K, KIM H W, et al.“Hard” ceramics for“Soft” tissue engineering:paradox or opportunity?[J]. Acta Biomater,2020, 115:1–28.
[15] NASERI S, LEPRY W C, NAZHAT S N. Bioactive glasses in wound healing:hope or hype?[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2017, 5(31):6167–6174.
[16] BORDA L J, MACQUHAE F E, KIRSNER R S. Wound dressings:a comprehensive review[J]. Curr Dermatol Rep, 2016, 5(4):287–297.
[17] WILKINSON H N, HARDMAN M J. Wound healing:cellular mechanisms and pathological outcomes[J]. Open Biol, 2020, 10(9):200223.
[18]邸铁涛,张春玲,陈露,等.糖尿病足溃疡的发病机制及难愈合原因分析[J].贵阳中医学院学报, 2017, 39(1):98–101.DI Tietao, ZHANG Chunling, CHEN Lu, et al. J Guiyang Univ Chin Med, 2017, 39(1):98–101.
[19] SCHILRREFF P, ALEXIEV U. Chronic inflammation in non-healing skin wounds and promising natural bioactive compounds treatment[J].Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(9):4928.
[20] BERMUDEZ D M, HERDRICH B J, XU J W, et al. Impaired biomechanical properties of diabetic skin implications in pathogenesis of diabetic wound complications[J]. Am J Pathol, 2011, 178(5):2215–2223.
[21] NELSON G, KUCHERYAVENKO O, WORDSWORTH J, et al. The senescent bystander effect is caused by ROS-activated NF-κB signalling[J]. Mech Ageing Dev, 2018, 170:30–36.
[22] LIU Y F, NI P W, HUANG Y, et al. Therapeutic strategies for chronic wound infection[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2022, 25(1):11–16.
[23] RAZIYEVA K, KIM Y, ZHARKINBEKOV Z, et al. Immunology of acute and chronic wound healing[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(5):700.
[24] JONES J R, BRAUER D S, HUPA leena, et al. Bioglass and bioactive glasses and their impact on healthcare[J]. Int J Appl Glass Sci, 2016,7(4):423–434.
[25] BRAUER D S, M?NCKE D. Chapter 3. introduction to the structure of silicate, phosphate and borate glasses[M]//Bioactive Glasses.Cambridge:Royal Society of Chemistry, 2016:61–88.
[26] VALLET-REGI M, SALINAS A J. Role of the short distance order in glass reactivity[J]. Materials, 2018, 11(3):415.
[27] SCHUHLADEN K, WANG X J, HUPA L, et al. Dissolution of borate and borosilicate bioactive glasses and the influence of ion(Zn, Cu)doping in different solutions[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2018, 502:22–34.
[28] FERNANDES H R, GADDAM A, REBELO A, et al. Bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics for healthcare applications in bone regeneration and tissue engineering[J]. Materials, 2018, 11(12):2530.
[29] EGE D, ZHENG K, BOCCACCINI A R. Borate bioactive glasses(BBG):bone regeneration, wound healing applications, and future directions[J]. ACS Appl Bio Mater, 2022, 5(8):3608–3622.
[30] LIU X, RAHAMAN M N, DAY D E. Conversion of melt-derived microfibrous borate(13-93B3)and silicate(45S5)bioactive glass in a simulated body fluid[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2013, 24(3):583–595.
[31] LEPRY W C, NAZHAT S N. Highly bioactive sol-gel-derived borate glasses[J]. Chem Mater, 2015, 27(13):4821–4831.
[32] LEPRY W C, SMITH S, NAZHAT S N. Effect of sodium on bioactive sol-gel-derived borate glasses[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2018, 500:141–148.
[33] DA SILVA L C A, NETO F G, PIMENTEL S S C, et al. The role of Ag2O on antibacterial and bioactive properties of borate glasses[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2021, 554:120611.
[34] FAN C, XU Q, HAO R Q, et al. Multi-functional wound dressings based on silicate bioactive materials[J]. Biomaterials, 2022, 287:121652.
[35] RAHIMNEJAD YAZDI A, TORKAN L, STONE W, et al. The impact of gallium content on degradation, bioactivity, and antibacterial potency of zinc borate bioactive glass[J]. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 2018, 106(1):367–376.
[36] DELIORMANL?A M. Sol-gel synthesis of borate-based 13-93B3bioactive glass powders for biomedical applications[J]. Mater Technol,2022, 37(11):1808–1817.
[37] LEPRY W C, NAZHAT S N. The anomaly in bioactive sol-gel borate glasses[J]. Mater Adv, 2020, 1(5):1371–1381.
[38] WANG Y D, PAN H B, CHEN X F. The preparation of hollow mesoporous bioglass nanoparticles with excellent drug delivery capacity for bone tissue regeneration[J]. Front Chem, 2019, 7:283.
[39] SHAFAGHI R, RODRIGUEZ O, WREN A W, et al. In vitro evaluation of novel titania-containing borate bioactive glass scaffolds[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2021, 109(2):146–158.
[40] CHO J S, KANG Y C. Synthesis of spherical shape borate-based bioactive glass powders prepared by ultrasonic spray pyrolysis[J].Ceram Int, 2009, 35(6):2103–2109.
[41] HENCH L L, SPLINTER R J, ALLEN W C, et al. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1971, 5(6):117–141.
[42] HOPPE A, MOURI?O V, BOCCACCINI A R. Therapeutic inorganic ions in bioactive glasses to enhance bone formation and beyond[J].Biomater Sci, 2013, 1(3):254–256.
[43] HUANG W H, DAY D E, KITTIRATANAPIBOON K, et al. Kinetics and mechanisms of the conversion of silicate(45S5), borate, and borosilicate glasses to hydroxyapatite in dilute phosphate solutions[J].J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2006, 17(7):583–596.
[44] ABODUNRIN O D, EL MABROUK K, BRICHA M. A review on borate bioactive glasses(BBG):effect of doping elements, degradation,and applications[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2023, 11(5):955–973.
[45] CHEN R G, LI Q, ZHANG Q, et al. Nanosized HCA-coated borate bioactive glass with improved wound healing effects on rodent model[J]. Chem Eng J, 2021, 426:130299.
[46] PRAMANIK C, WANG T D, GHOSHAL S, et al. Microfibrous borate bioactive glass dressing sequesters bone-bound bisphosphonate in the presence of simulated body fluid[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2015, 3(6):959–963.
[47] LIU X, XIE Z P, ZHANG C Q, et al. Bioactive borate glass scaffolds:in vitro and in vivo evaluation for use as a drug delivery system in the treatment of bone infection[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2010, 21(2):575–582.
[48] HOPPE A, BRANDL A, BLEIZIFFER O, et al. In vitro cell response to Co-containing 1393 bioactive glass[J]. Mater Sci Eng C, 2015, 57:157–163.
[49] PIZZORNO L. Nothing boring about boron[J]. Integr Med(Encinitas).2015, 14(4):35–48.
[50] BROWN R F, RAHAMAN M N, DWILEWICZ A B, et al. Effect of borate glass composition on its conversion to hydroxyapatite and on the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2009,88A(2):392–400.
[51] RAHAMAN M N, DAY D E, BAL B S, et al. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering[J]. Acta Biomater, 2011, 7(6):2355–2373.
[52] MODGLIN V C, BROWN R F, JUNG S B, et al. Cytotoxicity assessment of modified bioactive glasses with MLO-A5 osteogenic cells in vitro[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2013, 24(5):1191–1199.
[53] LIU X, HUANG W H, FU H L, et al. Bioactive borosilicate glass scaffolds:in vitro degradation and bioactivity behaviors[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2009, 20(6):1237–1243.
[54] ZHANG X, JIA W T, GU Y F, et al. Teicoplanin-loaded borate bioactive glass implants for treating chronic bone infection in a rabbit tibia osteomyelitis model[J]. Biomaterials, 2010, 31(22):5865–5874.
[55] JUNG S B, DAY D, BROWN R F R, et al. Potential toxicity of bioactive borate glasses In-vitro and In-vivo[J]. Adv Biocera Porous Ceram V, 2012:65–74.
[56] BUCK D W. Innovative bioactive glass fiber technology accelerates wound healing and minimizes costs:a case series[J]. Adv Skin Wound Care, 2020, 33(8):1–6.
[57] ETS Wound Care Home Page. http://www.etissuesolutions.com 2020,8, 3.
[58] ARMSTRONG D G, ORGILL D P, GALIANO R D, et al. A multi-centre, single-blinded randomised controlled clinical trial evaluating the effect of resorbable glass fibre matrix in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers[J]. Int Wound J, 2022, 19(4):791–801.
[59] NAZARNEZHAD S, BAINO F, KIM H W, et al. Electrospun nanofibers for improved angiogenesis:promises for tissue engineering applications[J]. Nanomaterials, 2020, 10(8):1609.
[60] ZEIMARAN E, POURSHAHRESTANI S, FATHI A, et al. Advances in bioactive glass-containing injectable hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration[J]. Acta Biomater, 2021, 136:1–36.
[61] ZHAO S C, LI L, WANG H, et al. Wound dressings composed of copper-doped borate bioactive glass microfibers stimulate angiogenesis and heal full-thickness skin defects in a rodent model[J]. Biomaterials,2015, 53:379–391.
[62] HU H R, TANG Y, PANG L B, et al. Angiogenesis and full-thickness wound healing efficiency of a copper-doped borate bioactive glass/poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)dressing loaded with vitamin E in vivo and in vitro[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10(27):22939–22950.
[63] NASERI S, LEPRY W C, MAISURIA V B, et al. Development and characterization of silver-doped sol-gel-derived borate glasses with anti-bacterial activity[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2019, 505:438–446.
[64] DELIORMANL?A M, SEDA VATANSEVER H, YESIL H, et al. In vivo evaluation of cerium, gallium and vanadium-doped borate-based bioactive glass scaffolds using rat subcutaneous implantation model[J].Ceram Int, 2016, 42(10):11574–11583.
[65] SCHUHLADEN K, RAGHU S N V, LIVERANI L, et al. Production of a novel poly(?-caprolactone)-methylcellulose electrospun wound dressing by incorporating bioactive glass and Manuka honey[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 2021, 109(2):180–192.
[66] TANG Y, PANG L B, WANG D P. Preparation and characterization of borate bioactive glass cross-linked PVA hydrogel[J]. J Non Cryst Solids, 2017, 476:25–29.
[67] ZHAI X Y, RUAN C S, MA Y F, et al. 3D-bioprinted osteoblast-laden nanocomposite hydrogel constructs with induced microenvironments promote cell viability, differentiation, and osteogenesis both in vitro and in vivo[J]. Adv Sci, 2017, 5(3):1700550.
[68] CUI X, HUANG C C, CHEN Z Z, et al. Hyaluronic acid facilitates bone repair effects of calcium phosphate cement by accelerating osteogenic expression[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(11):3801–3811.
[69] CHEN Q C, WU J, LIU Y, et al. Electrospun chitosan/PVA/bioglass Nanofibrous membrane with spatially designed structure for accelerating chronic wound healing[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 105:110083.
[70] ZHENG Z Q, BIAN S Q, LI Z Q, et al. Catechol modified quaternized chitosan enhanced wet adhesive and antibacterial properties of injectable thermo-sensitive hydrogel for wound healing[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2020, 249:116826.
[71] SCHUHLADEN K, BEDNARZIG V, REMBOLD N, et al. The effect of borate bioactive glass on the printability of methylcellulose-manuka honey hydrogels[J]. J Mater Res, 2021, 36(19):3843–3850.
[72] CHITTURI R, BADDAM V R, PRASAD L, et al. A review on role of essential trace elements in health and disease[J]. J NTR Univ Health Sci, 2015, 4(2):75.
[73] BIENERT G P, TAMáS M J. Editorial:molecular mechanisms of metalloid transport, toxicity and tolerance[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol,2018, 6:99.
[74] KARGOZAR S, HAMZEHLOU S, BAINO F. Can bioactive glasses be useful to accelerate the healing of epithelial tissues?[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2019, 97:1009–1020.
[75] POURSHAHRESTANI S, ZEIMARAN E, KADRI N A, et al.Gallium-containing mesoporous bioactive glass with potent hemostatic activity and antibacterial efficacy[J]. J Mater Chem B, 2016, 4(1):71–86.
[76] WANG X C, CHANG J, WU C T. Bioactive inorganic/organic nanocomposites for wound healing[J]. Appl Mater Today, 2018, 11:308–319.
[77] M?RZA S M, MAGYARI K, BOGDAN S, et al. Skin wound regeneration with bioactive glass-gold nanoparticles ointment[J].Biomed Mater, 2019, 14(2):025011.
[78] FRANCIS L, MENG D C, LOCKE I C, et al. Novel poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)composite films containing bioactive glass nanoparticles for wound healing applications[J]. Polym Int, 2016,65(6):661–674.
[79] CUI X, HUANG W H, ZHANG Y D, et al. Evaluation of an injectable bioactive borate glass cement to heal bone defects in a rabbit femoral condyle model[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2017, 73:585–595.
[80] DEMIRCI S, DO?AN A, AYD?N S, et al. Boron promotes streptozotocin-induced diabetic wound healing:roles in cell proliferation and migration, growth factor expression, and inflammation[J]. Mol Cell Biochem, 2016, 417(1–2):119–133.
[81] ZHOU J, WANG H, ZHAO S C, et al. In vivo and in vitro studies of borate based glass micro-fibers for dermal repairing[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2016, 60:437–445.
基本信息:
DOI：10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20230592
中图分类号:TQ171.1;R318.08
引用信息:
[1]柳春玉,王雪,舒丹,等.硼酸/硼硅酸盐生物活性玻璃促创面愈合进展[J].硅酸盐学报,2024,52(02):681-693.DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20230592.
基金信息:
国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFC2400500);; 广东省海洋经济发展专项资金项目(GDNRC[2023]35);; 国家自然科学基金(U2001221、32161160327、3200930);; 深圳市科技计划资助(JCYJ2020109114620793、JSGGKQTD20210831174330015);; 中国博士后科学基金(2020M682992);; 出站博士后留(来)深科研资助
2023-12-13
2023-12-13
2023-12-13