硅酸盐学报

参考文献

[1] MURRAY C E, COLEMAN C M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on bone health[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(19):4873.

[2] HU Y, CHEN X, WANG S C, et al. Subchondral bone microenvironment in osteoarthritis and pain[J]. Bone Res, 2021, 9(1):20.

[3] REDDI A H. Morphogenesis and tissue engineering of bone and cartilage:Inductive signals, stem cells, and biomimetic biomaterials[J].Tissue Eng, 2000, 6(4):351–359.

[4] SENGUPTA D, WALDMAN S D, LI S. From in vitro to in situ tissue engineering[J]. Ann Biomed Eng, 2014, 42(7):1537–1545.

[5] SONG L, SENGUPTA D, SHU C E. Vascular tissue engineering:From in vitro to in situ[J]. WIREs Mechanisms Disease, 2014, 6(1):61–76.

[6] YANG M, BRACKENBURY W J. Membrane potential and cancer progression[J]. Front Physiol, 2013, 4:185.

[7] NAIR M, CALAHORRA Y, KAR-NARAYAN S, et al. Self-assembly of collagen bundles and enhanced piezoelectricity induced by chemical crosslinking[J]. Nanoscale, 2019, 11(32):15120–15130.

[8] HENG B C, BAI Y Y, LI X C, et al. Electroactive biomaterials for facilitating bone defect repair under pathological conditions[J]. Adv Sci, 2023, 10(2):e2204502.

[9] ZHENG T Y, HUANG Y Q, ZHANG X H, et al. Mimicking the electrophysiological microenvironment of bone tissue using electroactive materials to promote its regeneration[J]. J Mater Chem B,2020, 8(45):10221–10256.

[10] KAPAT K, SHUBHRA Q T H, ZHOU M A, et al. Piezoelectric nano-biomaterials for biomedicine and tissue regeneration[J]. Adv Funct Mater, 2020, 30(44):1909045.

[11] RAY S, BEHARI J. Electrical conduction in bone in frequency range0.4?1.3 GHz[J]. Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs, 1986, 14(3–4):153–165.

[12] YASUDA I, NOGUCHI K, SATA T. Dynamic callus and electric callus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1955, 37:1292–1293.

[13] RAVI H K, SIMONA F, HULLIGER J, et al. Molecular origin of piezo-and pyroelectric properties in collagen investigated by molecular dynamics simulations[J]. J Phys Chem B, 2012, 116(6):1901–1907.

[14] EL MESSIERY M A, HASTINGS G W, RAKOWSKI S.Ferro-electricity of dry cortical bone[J]. J Biomed Eng, 1979, 1(1):63–65.

[15] LIU J Z, HOU Z D, QU C, et al. Experimental study on the coupling between the piezoelectric and streaming potential in wet bone[J]. J Biomech, 2023, 147:111454.

[16] GUO J X, CHEN W W, CHEN H S, et al. Recent progress in optical control of ferroelectric polarization[J]. Adv Optical Mater, 2021, 9(23):2002146.

[17] CIOFANI G, RICOTTI L, CANALE C, et al. Effects of Barium titanate nanoparticles on proliferation and differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2013, 102:312–320.

[18] DUBEY A K, KINOSHITA R, KAKIMOTO K I. Piezoelectric sodium potassium niobate mediated improved polarization and in vitro bioactivity of hydroxyapatite[J]. RSC Adv, 2015, 5(25):19638–19646.

[19] YAO T T, CHEN J Q, WANG Z G, et al. The antibacterial effect of potassium-sodium niobate ceramics based on controlling piezoelectric properties[J]. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces, 2019, 175:463–468.

[20] TANG B L, ZHANG B, ZHUANG J J, et al. Surface potential-governed cellular osteogenic differentiation on ferroelectric polyvinylidene fluoride trifluoroethylene films[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018,74:291–301.

[21] PARK J B, VON RECUM A F, KENNER G H, et al. Piezoelectric ceramic implants:A feasibility study[J]. J Biomed Mater Res, 1980,14(3):269–277.

[22] YU S W, KUO S T, TUAN W H, et al. Cytotoxicity and degradation behavior of potassium sodium niobate piezoelectric ceramics[J].Ceram Int, 2012, 38(4):2845–2850.

[23] BARBERI J, SPRIANO S. Titanium and protein adsorption:an overview of mechanisms and effects of surface features[J]. Materials,2021, 14(7):1590.

[24] HARJANTO D, ZAMAN M H. Matrix mechanics and receptor-ligand interactions in cell adhesion[J]. Org Biomol Chem, 2010, 8(2):299–304.

[25] CHEN W, YU Z X, PANG J S, et al. Fabrication of biocompatible potassium sodium niobate piezoelectric ceramic as an electroactive implant[J]. Materials, 2017, 10(4):345.

[26] CHEN J Q, LI W P, ZHOU L, et al. A built-in electric field with nanoscale distinction for cell behavior regulation[J]. J Mater Chem B,2018, 6(18):2723–2727.

[27] ZHANG J M, HE X Z, ZHOU Z Y, et al. The osteogenic response to chirality-patterned surface potential distribution of CFO/P(VDF-TrFE)membranes[J]. Biomater Sci, 2022, 10(16):4576–4587.

[28] BELOTI M M, DE OLIVEIRA P T, GIMENES R, et al. In vitro biocompatibility of a novel membrane of the composite poly(vinylidene-trifluoroethylene)/barium titanate[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2006, 79(2):282–288.

[29] WANG P, ZHOU X S, LV C L, et al. Modulating the surface potential of microspheres by phase transition in strontium doped Barium titanate to restore the electric microenvironment for bone regeneration[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10:988300.

[30] WANG W J, LI J H, LIU H, et al. Advancing versatile ferroelectric materials toward biomedical applications[J]. Adv Sci, 2021, 8(1):2003074.

[31] WANG Z L, SONG J H. Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays[J]. Science, 2006, 312(5771):242–246.

[32] QIN D, WANG N, YOU X G, et al. Collagen-based biocomposites inspired by bone hierarchical structures for advanced bone regeneration:Ongoing research and perspectives[J]. Biomater Sci, 2022, 10(2):318–353.

[33] VASILESCU D, CORNILLON R, MALLET G. Piezoelectric resonances in amino-acids[J]. Nature, 1970, 225(5233):635.

[34] WANG R X, SUI J J, WANG X D. Natural piezoelectric biomaterials:A biocompatible and sustainable building block for biomedical devices[J]. ACS Nano, 2022, 16(11):17708–17728.

[35] YANG F, LI J, LONG Y, et al. Wafer-scale heterostructured piezoelectric bio-organic thin films[J]. Science, 2021, 373(6552):337–342.

[36] KHOLKIN A, AMDURSKY N, BDIKIN I, et al. Strong piezoelectricity in bioinspired peptide nanotubes[J]. ACS Nano, 2010,4(2):610–614.

[37] TAO K, XUE B, LI Q, et al. Stable and optoelectronic dipeptide assemblies for power harvesting[J]. Mater Today, 2019, 30:10–16.

[38] CARTWRIGHT V F, BROWN C P. Hierarchical piezoresponse in collagen[J]. Adv Mater Technol, 2022, 7(4):2101166.

[39] YUCEL T, CEBE P, KAPLAN D L. Structural origins of silk piezoelectricity[J]. Adv Funct Mater, 2011, 21(4):779–785.

[40] LI Y B, LIU Y Z, LI R H, et al. Collagen-based biomaterials for bone tissue engineering[J]. Mater Des, 2021, 210:110049.

[41] DENG J P, SONG Q, LIU S Y, et al. Advanced applications of cellulose-based composites in fighting bone diseases[J]. Compos Part B Eng, 2022, 245:110221.

[42] PATEL D K, DUTTA S D, JIN H X, et al. 3D-printable chitosan/silk fibroin/cellulose nanoparticle scaffolds for bone regeneration via M2macrophage polarization[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2022, 281:119077.

[43] DI MARTINO A, SITTINGER M, RISBUD M V. Chitosan:A versatile biopolymer for orthopaedic tissue-engineering[J].Biomaterials, 2005, 26(30):5983–5990.

[44] ZHOU Z Y, ZHANG J M, DUAN X Y, et al. Laser annealing of graphene/P(VDF-TrFE)composite films and its effects on protein adsorption[J]. Mater Lett, 2022, 308:131119.

[45] FARAHANI A, ZAREI-HANZAKI A, ABEDI H R, et al. An investigation into the polylactic acid texturization through thermomechanical processing and the improved d33 piezoelectric outcome of the fabricated scaffolds[J]. J Mater Res Technol, 2021, 15:6356–6366.

[46] JIAO H, SONG S, ZHAO K, et al. Synthesis and properties of porous piezoelectric BT/PHBV composite scaffold[J]. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 2020, 31(12):1552–1565.

[47] TOKIWA Y, CALABIA B P. Biodegradability and biodegradation of poly(lactide)[J]. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2006, 72(2):244–251.

[48] WANG L Y, DU J Q, CAO D R, et al. Recent advances and the application of poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate)as tissue engineering materials[J]. J Macromol Sci Part A, 2013, 50(8):885–893.

[49] LIU W W, YANG D, WEI X H, et al. Fabrication of piezoelectric porous Ba TiO3 scaffold to repair large segmental bone defect in sheep[J]. J Biomater Appl, 2020, 35(4–5):544–552.

[50] CHANG M C, TANG C M, LIN Y H, et al. Toxic mechanisms of Roth801, canals, microparticles and nanoparticles of ZnO on MG-63osteoblasts[J]. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2021, 119:111635.

[51] XING D L, ZUO W, CHEN J H, et al. Spatial delivery of triple functional nanoparticles via an extracellular matrix-mimicking coaxial scaffold synergistically enhancing bone regeneration[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(33):37380–37395.

[52] MURILLO G, BLANQUER A, VARGAS-ESTEVEZ C, et al.Bioelectronics:Electromechanical nanogenerator-cell interaction modulates cell activity[J]. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(24):1605048.

[53] HARADA Y, KADONO K, TERAO T, et al. Helical conformation endows poly-l-lactic acid fibers with a piezoelectric charge under tensile stress[J]. J Vet Med Sci, 2013, 75(9):1187–1192.

[54] CHEN J Y, SONG L, QI F W, et al. Enhanced bone regeneration via ZIF-8 decorated hierarchical polyvinylidene fluoride piezoelectric foam nanogenerator:Coupling of bioelectricity, angiogenesis, and osteogenesis[J]. Nano Energy, 2023, 106:108076.

[55] LEI J, WANG C F, FENG X B, et al. Sulfur-regulated defect engineering for enhanced ultrasonic piezocatalytic therapy of bacteria-infected bone defects[J]. Chem Eng J, 2022, 435:134624.

[56] CAI K Z, JIAO Y L, QUAN Q, et al. Improved activity of MC3T3-E1cells by the exciting piezoelectric BaTiO3/TC4 using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound[J]. Bioact Mater, 2021, 6(11):4073–4082.

[57] CHEN J, LI S J, JIAO Y L, et al. In vitro study on the piezodynamic therapy with a BaTiO3-coating titanium scaffold under low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2021,13(41):49542–49555.

[58] ZHANG J M, HE X Z, CHEN X Y, et al. Enhancing osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs on high magnetoelectric response films[J].Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 2020, 113:110970.

[59] REIS J, FRIAS C, CANTO E CASTRO C, et al. A new piezoelectric actuator induces bone formation in vivo:A preliminary study[J]. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2012, 2012:613403.

[60] CARTER A, POPOWSKI K, CHENG K, et al. Enhancement of bone regeneration through the converse piezoelectric effect, a novel approach for applying mechanical stimulation[J]. Bioelectricity, 2021,3(4):255–271.

[61] KOHATA K, ITOH S, HORIUCHI N, et al. Influences of osteoarthritis and osteoporosis on the electrical properties of human bones as in vivo electrets produced due to Wolff’s law[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2017, 28(1):65–74.

[62] YU B, QIAO Z G, CUI J J, et al. A host-coupling bio-nanogenerator for electrically stimulated osteogenesis[J]. Biomaterials, 2021, 276:120997.

[63] QIAO Z G, LIAN M F, LIU X Z, et al. Electreted sandwich membranes with persistent electrical stimulation for enhanced bone regeneration[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2022, 14(28):31655–31666.

[64] WANG Y Y, SUN X D, WANG Q F, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of porous chitosan electret membrane for bone regeneration[J]. J Bioact Compatible Polym, 2018, 33(4):426–438.

[65] ANDRABI W H, BEHARI J. Formation of bone electrets and their charge decay characteristics[J]. Biomaterials, 1981, 2(2):120–123.

[66] LAGOMARSINI C, JEAN-MISTRAL C, MONFRAY S, et al.Optimization of an electret-based soft hybrid generator for human body applications[J]. Smart Mater Struct, 2019, 28(10):104003.

[67] ZAFAR M U, BRAVO-CORDERO J J, TORRAMADE-MOIX S, et al.Effects of electret coating technology on coronary stent thrombogenicity[J]. Platelets, 2022, 33(2):312–319.

[68] LONG X J, WANG X Z, YAO L L, et al. Graphene/Si-promoted osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs through light illumination[J].ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(47):43857–43864.

[69] CHANG T W, LI Y S, MATSUHISA N, et al. Emerging polymer electrets for transistor-structured memory devices and artificial synapses[J]. J Mater Chem C, 2022, 10(37):13372–13394.

[70] WU C W, HE X Z, WENG W J, et al. Electroactive extracellular matrix/polypyrrole composite films and their microenvironmental effects on osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs[J]. Chem Eng J, 2022,443:136508.

[71] WEI Y, MO X J, ZHANG P C, et al. Directing stem cell differentiation via electrochemical reversible switching between nanotubes and nanotips of polypyrrole array[J]. ACS Nano, 2017, 11(6):5915–5924.

[72] LIU Z R, WAN X Y, WANG Z L, et al. Electroactive biomaterials and systems for cell fate determination and tissue regeneration:Design and applications[J]. Adv Mater, 2021, 33(32):e2007429.

[73] RAVICHANDRAN R, SUNDARRAJAN S, VENUGOPAL J R, et al.Applications of conducting polymers and their issues in biomedical engineering[J]. J R Soc Interface, 2010, 7(Suppl 5):S559–S579.

[74] PAULSEN B D, TYBRANDT K, STAVRINIDOU E, et al. Organic mixed ionic-electronic conductors[J]. Nat Mater, 2020, 19(1):13–26.

[75] KA?PáRKOVáV, HUMPOLí?EK P, STEJSKAL J, et al. Exploring the critical factors limiting polyaniline biocompatibility[J]. Polymers,2019, 11(2):362.

[76] IANDOLO D, RAVICHANDRAN A, LIU X J, et al. Development and characterization of organic electronic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering[J]. Adv Healthc Mater, 2016, 5(12):1505–1512.

[77] HUANG Y Z, ZHANG L Y, JI Y R, et al. A non-invasive smart scaffold for bone repair and monitoring[J]. Bioact Mater, 2022, 19:499–510.

[78] SHIN S R, LI Y C, JANG H L, et al. Graphene-based materials for tissue engineering[J]. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 2016, 105:255–274.

[79] CHETYRKINA M R, FEDOROV F S, NASIBULIN A G. In vitro toxicity of carbon nanotubes:A systematic review[J]. RSC Adv, 2022,12(25):16235–16256.

[80] DUTTA R C, DEY M, DUTTA A K, et al. Competent processing techniques for scaffolds in tissue engineering[J]. Biotechnol Adv, 2017,35(2):240–250.

[81] POBLOTH A M, CHECA S, RAZI H, et al. Mechanobiologically optimized 3D titanium-mesh scaffolds enhance bone regeneration in critical segmental defects in sheep[J]. Sci Transl Med, 2018, 10(423):eaam8828.

[82] GHOSH S, WEBSTER T. Metallic nanoscaffolds as osteogenic promoters:Advances, challenges and scope[J]. Metals, 2021, 11(9):1356.

[83] FRATODDI I, VENDITTI I, CAMETTI C, et al. How toxic are gold nanoparticles? The state-of-the-art[J]. Nano Res, 2015, 8(6):1771–1799.

[84] CARNOVALE C, BRYANT G, SHUKLA R, et al. Size, shape and surface chemistry of nano-gold dictate its cellular interactions, uptake and toxicity[J]. Prog Mater Sci, 2016, 83:152–190.

[85] POURJAVADI A, DOROUDIAN M, AHADPOUR A, et al. Injectable chitosan/κ-carrageenan hydrogel designed with au nanoparticles:A conductive scaffold for tissue engineering demands[J]. Int J Biol Macromol, 2019, 126:310–317.

[86] NAVAEI A, SAINI H, CHRISTENSON W, et al. Gold nanorod-incorporated gelatin-based conductive hydrogels for engineering cardiac tissue constructs[J]. Acta Biomater, 2016, 41:133–146.

[87] LI J F, LIU X, CROOK J M, et al. A 3D printed graphene electrode device for enhanced and scalable stem cell culture, osteoinduction and tissue building[J]. Mater Des, 2021, 201:109473.

[88] ZHANG Z Z, ZHENG T Y, ZHU R. Microchip with single-cell impedance measurements for monitoring osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells under electrical stimulation[J]. Anal Chem,2020, 92(18):12579–12587.

[89] DAWSON J, LEE P S, VAN RIENEN U, et al. A general theoretical framework to study the influence of electrical fields on mesenchymal stem cells[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2020, 8:557447.

[90] LIU S H, FU Y, LI G J, et al. Conjugated polymer for voltage-controlled release of molecules[J]. Adv Mater, 2017, 29(35):1701733.

[91] ZHU Y F, YAO L L, LIU Z G, et al. Electrical potential specified release of BSA/hep/polypyrrole composite film and its cellular responses[J]. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11(28):25457–25464.

[92] QU J, ZHAO X, MA P X, et al. Injectable antibacterial conductive hydrogels with dual response to an electric field and pH for localized smart drug release[J]. Acta Biomater, 2018, 72:55–69.

[93] DA SILVA L P, KUNDU S C, REIS R L, et al. Electric phenomenon:A disregarded tool in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine[J].Trends Biotechnol, 2020, 38(1):24–49.