nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 08, v.53 2100-2108
退役光伏层压件关键有机组元共热解:比例差异对热解特性的影响机制
基金项目(Foundation): 国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3906201); 国家杰出青年科学基金(52325606); 中国科学院稳定支持基础研究领域青年团队计划(YSBR-044); 内蒙古自治区“揭榜挂帅”项目(2024JBGS0034)
邮箱(Email): skd993920@sdust.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250120
摘要:

热解作为回收处理退役光伏层压件的有效手段,可以深度去除层压件中的封装剂(EVA)和含氟背板(TPT)。本工作对不同质量比例EVA和TPT共热解特性、动力学及热解机理进行了研究。结果表明:共热解质量损失率随TPT占比减少而增加,当EVA和TPT质量比为5∶1时,质量损失率最大,为97.9%。TPT会促进结焦,降低共热解程度,当EVA和TPT质量比为2∶1时,理论热解程度和实际热解程度的差值总体为负,拮抗作用最为明显,平均活化能为245.1k J/mol。通过Coats-Redfern法拟合,共热解过程均遵循扩散机理,其中EVA和TPT质量比为2∶1、3.4∶1.0和5∶1时分别遵循扩散机理中的D5、D3和D6机制。

Abstract:

Introduction China is a large country in the photovoltaic(PV) industry,with a vast amount of end-of-life(EOL) PV modules requiring proper management.However,encapsulants(EVA) and fluorine-containing backsheet(TPT) in PV laminates,as high molecular weight organic polymers,impede subsequent PV recycling processes.Pyrolysis is an effective means for recycling end-of-life PV laminates by removing the EVA and TPT.However,in practical pyrolysis processes,EVA and TPT are inevitably co-pyrolysis together.Due to variations in manufacturing methods,the proportion of organic components differs among PV laminate models,potentially affecting their co-pyrolysis behavior—A topic that remains underexplored.This study focuses on investigating the co-pyrolysis characteristics and mechanisms of EVA and TPT at different mixing mass ratios.Kinetic modeling was employed to analyze the heat loss behavior and determine the co-pyrolysis mechanisms.Methods The EVA hot melt adhesive used in the experiment was sourced from Jiacheng Plastics Co.,Ltd(China) with a particle size lower than 100 mesh.The TPT was obtained from You disheng Electronic Materials Co.,Ltd(China).The TPT was crushed,ground,and sieved to pass through a100 mesh standard sieve,and then dried in an oven at 60℃ for 12 h.The mixing mass ratios of EVA and TPT were determined to be 5:1,3.4:1.0,and 2:1 through literature research and experimental validation.A thermogravimetric analyzer(TG,STA 449 F5 Jupiter,NETZSCH) was used under an argon atmosphere with a flow rate of 50mL/min.Samples of(10.0±1.0) mg of EVA,TPT,and different ratios of their mixtures were placed in crucibles.The samples were heated from 50℃ to 800℃.Based on an extensive literature review,the heating rates of 10,15,20 ℃/min,and 25℃/min were selected.The synergistic effect was characterized using the difference between the theoretical and actual degrees of pyrolysis(△W) to investigate potential pyrolytic interactions during the co-pyrolysis process.The Flynn-Wall-Ozawa(FWO) method and the Kissinger-Akahira-Sunose(KAS) method(Model-free method) were employed to calculate the activation energy,and the Coats-Redfern(CR) method(Model-free method) was chosen to ascertain the pyrolysis reaction mechanism.Results and discussion The co-pyrolysis weight loss was divided into two stages,the first stage was treated at 300-380℃,which was mainly due to the deacetylation of EVA to produce acetic acid.The second stage was at 380-510℃,corresponding to the degradation of EVA and TPT long chains.At 800 ℃,the co-pyrolysis of EVA and TPT with the ratio of 2:1 resulted in a total weight loss of approximately 94.5%,while ratios of 3.4:1.0 and 5:1 achieved higher total weight losses of 96.7% and 97.9%,respectively.As the proportion of TPT decreased,the total weight loss ratio of the mixture gradually increased,which may be due to the presence of PET in TPT.The presence of benzene rings in PET caused cross-linking of the product,generating more polyaromatic hydrocarbons and promoting coking.The overall synergistic interaction between EVA and TPT during co-pyrolysis was antagonistic effect.The antagonistic effect was most pronounced when the ratio of EVA to TPT was 2:1,probably due to the increase in TPT,which made the coking more pronounced.The average activation energy of co-pyrolysis was higher than that of EVA and TPT pyrolysis alone,suggesting that more energy was required for co-pyrolysis,further supporting the antagonistic effect of co-pyrolysis.The average activation energies were 244.7-245.5,239.6-240.1 kJ/mol and 261.2-262.8 kJ/mol for EVA and TPT mass ratios of 2:1,3.4:1.0 and 5:1,respectively.In order to further determine the reaction mechanism of the co-pyrolysis,the reaction mechanism of the co-pyrolysis process was explored using the CR method.The co-pyrolysis followed the diffusion controlled D5 model,D3 model,and D6 model for EVA and TPT mass ratios of 2:1,3.4:1.0 and 5:1,respectively.Changes in the mechanism functions of different ratios of co-pyrolysis further indicate the influence of the mass ratio of EVA and TPT on the interactions.Conclusions In this paper,the pyrolysis behaviour,kinetics and reaction mechanisms involved in the co-pyrolysis of EOL PV laminates at three mass ratios(2:1,3.4:1.0 and 5:1) of EVA and TPT were investigated,and key findings are as follows:1) The main pyrolysis happens between 300 ℃ to 510 ℃.As the proportion of TPT decreased,total weight loss increased.Specifically,the weight loss rose from 94.5% to 97.9% as the EVA:TPT mass ratio increased from 2:1 to 5:1.2) The degree of synergistic interaction varied with mixing ratio.TPT promoted char formation and reduced overall pyrolysis efficiency,particularly at the 2:1 ratio,where its proportion was highest.This antagonistic effect was reflected by an average activation energy of 245.1 kJ/mol.3) Coats-Redfern(CR) model fitting revealed that the co-pyrolysis of EVA and TPT followed diffusion-controlled mechanisms.The reaction models corresponded to D5,D3,and D6 for the 2:1,3.4:1.0,and 5:1 ratios,respectively.This work provides mechanistic insights into the co-pyrolysis behavior of key organic components in PV laminates and offers theoretical support for the development of thermal recovery methods for waste PV modules.

参考文献

[1]国家能源局. 2024年光伏发电建设情况[EB/OL].(2025–01–27).https://www.nea.gov.cn/20250221/f04452701c914d51a89d0c0ea6f4acd1/c.html.

[2] TAO M, FTHENAKIS V, EBIN B, et al. Major challenges and opportunities in silicon solar module recycling[J]. Prog Photovolt Res Appl, 2020, 28(10):1077–1088.

[3] HEATH G A, SILVERMAN T J, KEMPE M, et al. Research and development priorities for silicon photovoltaic module recycling to support a circular economy[J]. Nat Energy, 2020, 5:502–510.

[4]张建文,王海东,梁汉,等.退役晶硅光伏组件回收技术研究进展[J].矿冶工程, 2022, 42(3):147–152.ZHANG Jianwen, WANG Haidong, LIANG Han, et al. Min Metall Eng, 2022, 42(3):147–152.

[5] DIAS P, MACHADO A, HUDA N, et al. Waste electric and electronic equipment(WEEE)management:A study on the Brazilian recycling routes[J]. J Clean Prod, 2018, 174:7–16.

[6] DENG R, ZHUO Y T, SHEN Y S. Recent progress in silicon photovoltaic module recycling processes[J]. Resour Conserv Recycl,2022, 187:106612.

[7]王魁,李金惠,刘丽丽.退役晶硅光伏组件中材料物质回收技术现状分析与建议[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 55(6):2117–2128.WANG Kui, LI Jinhui, LIU Lili. J Cent South Univ Sci Technol, 2024,55(6):2117–2128.

[8] FARRELL C C, OSMAN A I, DOHERTY R, et al. Technical challenges and opportunities in realising a circular economy for waste photovoltaic modules[J]. Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 2020, 128:109911.

[9] LI X T, LIU H, YOU J C, et al. Back EVA recycling from c-Si photovoltaic module without damaging solar cell via laser irradiation followed by mechanical peeling[J]. Waste Manag, 2022, 137:312–318.

[10] MIN R, DENG W K, WANG Z, et al. Effective decapsulation method for photovoltaic modules:Limonene-induced EVA controlled swelling under sonication and debonding mechanism analysis[J]. J Clean Prod,2024, 450:141917.

[11] FU J W, LIU J Y, XU W J, et al. Torrefaction, temperature, and heating rate dependencies of pyrolysis of coffee grounds:Its performances,bio-oils, and emissions[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2022, 345:126346.

[12] GRANATA G, ALTIMARI P, PAGNANELLI F, et al. Recycling of solar photovoltaic panels:Techno-economic assessment in waste management perspective[J]. J Clean Prod, 2022, 363:132384.

[13]丁湧,李文建,陈昭宇,等.废旧晶体硅光伏组件EVA有氧热解动力学与产物特性[J].化工学报, 2024, 75(9):3310–3319.DING Yong, LI Wenjian, CHEN Zhaoyu, et al. CIESC J, 2024, 75(9):3310–3319.

[14]董莉,毕莹莹,刘景洋,等.废光伏组件背板TPT热动力学分析[J].塑料, 2021, 50(6):73–77.DONG Li, BI Yingying, LIU Jingyang, et al. Plastics, 2021, 50(6):73–77.

[15] GUO N, WANG Z W, CHEN G F, et al. Co-pyrolysis kinetic characteristics of wheat straw and hydrogen rich plastics based on TG-FTIR and Py-GC/MS[J]. Energy, 2024, 312:133683.

[16] SHAN T L, CHEN H, LIU T, et al. Synergistic effects in the co-pyrolysis of waste tires, plastics, and corn stalks:Kinetic and thermodynamic analyses for enhanced resource utilization[J]. Renew Energy, 2025, 238:122024.

[17] G?NEN?, KAPLANO?LU E. Environmental and economic evaluation of solar panel wastes recycling[J]. Waste Manag Res, 2019,37(4):412–418.

[18] LATUNUSSA C E L, ARDENTE F, BLENGINI G A, et al. Life cycle assessment of an innovative recycling process for crystalline silicon photovoltaic panels[J]. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2016, 156:101–111.

[19] LI F, TAO J Y, KUMAR A, et al. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of waste photovoltaic module:A TG-MS-FTIR study[J]. J Clean Prod,2024, 444:141267.

[20] SINGH R K, RUJ B, SADHUKHAN A K, et al. Impact of fast and slow pyrolysis on the degradation of mixed plastic waste:Product yield analysis and their characterization[J]. J Energy Inst, 2019, 92(6):1647–1657.

[21] SINGH R K, RUJ B, SADHUKHAN A K, et al. A TG-FTIR investigation on the co-pyrolysis of the waste HDPE, PP, PS and PET under high heating conditions[J]. J Energy Inst, 2020, 93(3):1020–1035.

[22] WANG S R, DAI G X, YANG H P, et al. Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism:A state-of-the-art review[J]. Prog Energy Combust Sci, 2017, 62:33–86.

[23] LING C C Y, LI S F Y. Synergistic interactions between sewage sludge,polypropylene, and high-density polyethylene during co-pyrolysis:An investigation based on iso-conversional model-free methods and master plot analysis[J]. J Hazard Mater, 2023, 455:131600.

基本信息:

DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250120

中图分类号:TM615

引用信息:

[1]张源忠,王建伟,顾菁,等.退役光伏层压件关键有机组元共热解:比例差异对热解特性的影响机制[J].硅酸盐学报,2025,53(08):2100-2108.DOI:10.14062/j.issn.0454-5648.20250120.

基金信息:

国家重点研发计划(2023YFC3906201); 国家杰出青年科学基金(52325606); 中国科学院稳定支持基础研究领域青年团队计划(YSBR-044); 内蒙古自治区“揭榜挂帅”项目(2024JBGS0034)

发布时间:

2025-05-29

出版时间:

2025-05-29

网络发布时间:

2025-05-29

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文